I thank the Minister of State for coming into the House to reply to this debate. This is a very emotive and important issue in my constituency. It has been going on for more than a year now. The Minister of State, to be fair to him, has been very active in attempting to come to a resolution. So far, unfortunately, his efforts have not been greeted with success, but we hope things will change very shortly because we all have to answer to our constituents. That is one of the things we have the pleasure of doing every three, four or five years, whenever it may be. In this case, I have tried to make allowances for the OPW and I have come to a conclusion. We have had weekly meetings, monthly meetings, working group meetings - all kinds of exchanges - and at the same time we have had to keep faith with the people who protested, now called the gatekeepers, and others who raised their concerns when it became obvious that what they had enjoyed in the past, that is, Castletown House and the 200 acres, approximately, of its environs, was about to become restricted insofar as their access to it was concerned. This came about when a person who purchased the adjoining property decided to restrict access to the house and put a gate across the road and so on.
The problem that immediately arises is whether the State has a right to access its property. It is a fundamental and important issue. It can be replicated again and again throughout the country in different locations. Whether the State has the right to visit and revisit its own property - not anybody else's property but property that it owns and has owned for many years - is the question. That will ultimately have to be decided legally. There may be no other way around it. People said a year ago, when this whole thing started, "It will take too long." Well, as a certain finance Minister uttered in Brussels some years ago, it takes as long as it takes but it has to be resolved. That means that the State has to make the case as to whether it is reasonable to expect that an adjoining landowner may restrict the State in its access and may render the State helpless and, as a result, may allow the house, which is a protected structure, to go into decay. In the past 12 months, no maintenance has been done, the grass and the weeds have grown all over, and the house has been neglected. It is neglected because the State's employees, its operatives, have not been able to travel to and from or to go through the house in the normal way, except because the OPW decreed, or the county council decided, that there was another way, the way that was accessible 300 years ago or thereabouts, when the house was built. That was onto the main street of Celbridge, which is heavily trafficked and is an area of extreme congestion at school times because there are schools all around.
The tableau prevails. The situation is the same as it was a year ago. I know the Minister of State has in mind a number of initiatives. We do not have time now because if this Dáil session does not deal with this issue, it will not be dealt with. I would be ashamed to have represented an area whereby this kind of situation occurred and we did not or could not do anything about it. It does not work that way, it does not happen that way and it will not happen that way, please God, when the Minister of State gets to grips with it.